hb_indic_would_substitute_feature_t pref;
hb_indic_would_substitute_feature_t blwf;
hb_indic_would_substitute_feature_t pstf;
+ hb_indic_would_substitute_feature_t vatu;
hb_mask_t mask_array[INDIC_NUM_FEATURES];
};
indic_plan->pref.init (&plan->map, HB_TAG('p','r','e','f'), zero_context);
indic_plan->blwf.init (&plan->map, HB_TAG('b','l','w','f'), zero_context);
indic_plan->pstf.init (&plan->map, HB_TAG('p','s','t','f'), zero_context);
+ indic_plan->vatu.init (&plan->map, HB_TAG('v','a','t','u'), zero_context);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_LENGTH (indic_plan->mask_array); i++)
indic_plan->mask_array[i] = (indic_features[i].flags & F_GLOBAL) ?
* base at 0. The font however, only has lookups matching
* 930,94D in 'blwf', not the expected 94D,930 (with new-spec
* table). As such, we simply match both sequences. Seems
- * to work. */
+ * to work.
+ *
+ * Vatu is done as well, for:
+ * https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1587
+ */
hb_codepoint_t glyphs[3] = {virama, consonant, virama};
if (indic_plan->blwf.would_substitute (glyphs , 2, face) ||
- indic_plan->blwf.would_substitute (glyphs+1, 2, face))
+ indic_plan->blwf.would_substitute (glyphs+1, 2, face) ||
+ indic_plan->vatu.would_substitute (glyphs , 2, face) ||
+ indic_plan->vatu.would_substitute (glyphs+1, 2, face))
return POS_BELOW_C;
if (indic_plan->pstf.would_substitute (glyphs , 2, face) ||
indic_plan->pstf.would_substitute (glyphs+1, 2, face))