<HTML>
<HEAD>
<!-- This HTML file has been created by texi2html 1.52b
- from gettext.texi on 6 June 2010 -->
+ from gettext.texi on 7 January 2014 -->
<META HTTP-EQUIV="content-type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<TITLE>GNU gettext utilities - 12 The Translator's View</TITLE>
Some people wonder if using GNU <CODE>gettext</CODE> necessarily brings their
package under the protective wing of the GNU General Public License or
-the GNU Library General Public License, when they do not want to make
+the GNU Lesser General Public License, when they do not want to make
their program free, or want other kinds of freedom. The simplest
answer is “normally not”.
The <CODE>gettext-runtime</CODE> part of GNU <CODE>gettext</CODE>, i.e. the
-contents of <CODE>libintl</CODE>, is covered by the GNU Library General Public
+contents of <CODE>libintl</CODE>, is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public
License. The <CODE>gettext-tools</CODE> part of GNU <CODE>gettext</CODE>, i.e. the
rest of the GNU <CODE>gettext</CODE> package, is covered by the GNU General
Public License.
or so, taking many weeks or months for bigger packages. But it does
not work this way. I first did all the things I'm responsible for.
I've nothing against some missionary work on other maintainers, but
-I'm also loosing a lot of energy over it--same debates over again.
+I'm also losing a lot of energy over it--same debates over again.
</P>
<P>
<H2><A NAME="SEC209" HREF="gettext_toc.html#TOC209">12.6 Translating plural forms</A></H2>
<P>
-<A NAME="IDX1111"></A>
+<A NAME="IDX1119"></A>
Suppose you are translating a PO file, and it contains an entry like this:
</P>
</P>
<P>
-<A NAME="IDX1112"></A>
+<A NAME="IDX1120"></A>
Here a more details. The GNU <CODE>libintl</CODE> library (but not the
corresponding functions in GNU <CODE>libc</CODE>) supports an environment variable
<CODE>GETTEXT_LOG_UNTRANSLATED</CODE>. The GNU <CODE>libintl</CODE> library will