From ff9d78025c519046cfbc212b34f09116685402fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Neri Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:25:34 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod !=11b and ModRM.rm = 100b indexed register-indirect addressing is used. In other words, a SIB byte follows the ModRM byte. In the specific case of SIB.index = 100b, the scale*index portion of the computation of the effective address is null. To signal callers of this particular situation, get_reg_offset() can return -EDOM (-EINVAL continues to indicate that an error when decoding the SIB byte). An example of this situation can be the following instruction: 8b 4c 23 80 mov -0x80(%rbx,%riz,1),%rcx ModRM: 0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b] SIB: 0x23 [scale:0b][index:100b][base:11b] Displacement: 0x80 (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b) The %riz 'register' indicates a null index. In long mode, a REX prefix may be used. When a REX prefix is present, REX.X adds a fourth bit to the register selection of SIB.index. This gives the ability to refer to all the 16 general purpose registers. When REX.X is 1b and SIB.index is 100b, the index is indicated in %r12. In our example, this would look like: 42 8b 4c 23 80 mov -0x80(%rbx,%r12,1),%rcx REX: 0x42 [W:0b][R:0b][X:1b][B:0b] ModRM: 0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b] SIB: 0x23 [scale:0b][.X: 1b, index:100b][.B:0b, base:11b] Displacement: 0x80 (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b) %r12 is a valid register to use in the scale*index part of the effective address computation. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Adan Hawthorn Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Cc: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Huang Rui Cc: Qiaowei Ren Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Jiri Slaby Cc: Nathan Howard Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" Cc: Chris Metcalf Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: Chen Yucong Cc: Adam Buchbinder Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Joe Perches Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Andrew Morton Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509135945-13762-8-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com --- arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c index 57e5bf5..2ad1d4a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c @@ -110,6 +110,15 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs, regno = X86_SIB_INDEX(insn->sib.value); if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value)) regno += 8; + + /* + * If ModRM.mod != 3 and SIB.index = 4 the scale*index + * portion of the address computation is null. This is + * true only if REX.X is 0. In such a case, the SIB index + * is used in the address computation. + */ + if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) != 3 && regno == 4) + return -EDOM; break; case REG_TYPE_BASE: @@ -160,11 +169,19 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs) goto out; indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX); - if (indx_offset < 0) + /* + * A negative offset generally means a error, except + * -EDOM, which means that the contents of the register + * should not be used as index. + */ + if (indx_offset == -EDOM) + indx = 0; + else if (indx_offset < 0) goto out; + else + indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset); base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset); - indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset); eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib)); } else { -- 2.7.4