From ff2073a51fe283bde05f48c300e3a9ee807b1b6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Prantl Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:18:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Un-XFAIL a test after the bugfix in r317702. llvm-svn: 317708 --- llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/missing-abstract-variable.ll | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/missing-abstract-variable.ll b/llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/missing-abstract-variable.ll index 16dcdeb..8d5aff4 100644 --- a/llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/missing-abstract-variable.ll +++ b/llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/missing-abstract-variable.ll @@ -2,11 +2,6 @@ ; RUN: %llc_dwarf -O0 -filetype=obj < %s | llvm-dwarfdump -v -debug-info - | FileCheck %s -; The formal parameter 'b' for Function 'x' when inlined within 'a' is lost on -; mips and powerpc64 (and on x86_64 at at least -O2). Presumably this is a -; SelectionDAG issue (do mips/powerpc64 use FastISel?). -; XFAIL: mips, powerpc64, s390x, sparc - ; Build from the following source with clang -O2. ; The important details are that 'x's abstract definition is first built during -- 2.7.4