From ff17119dceef98b6b3a4dfb2fdff896f47c7fbd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:17:23 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] tcp: make tcp_read_sock() more robust [ Upstream commit e3d5ea2c011ecb16fb94c56a659364e6b30fac94 ] If recv_actor() returns an incorrect value, tcp_read_sock() might loop forever. Instead, issue a one time warning and make sure to make progress. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220302161723.3910001-2-eric.dumazet@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c index f48f105..ef68d55 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c @@ -1663,11 +1663,13 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc, if (!copied) copied = used; break; - } else if (used <= len) { - seq += used; - copied += used; - offset += used; } + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(used > len)) + used = len; + seq += used; + copied += used; + offset += used; + /* If recv_actor drops the lock (e.g. TCP splice * receive) the skb pointer might be invalid when * getting here: tcp_collapse might have deleted it -- 2.7.4