From fe719888344ccc7f0046e787a75bb15b6a40b39f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anand K Mistry Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:42:36 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] proc: provide details on indirect branch speculation Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. For testing/benchmarking, I needed to see whether IB (Indirect Branch) speculation (see Spectre-v2) is enabled on a task, to see whether an IBPB instruction should be executed on an address space switch. Unfortunately, this information isn't available anywhere else and currently the only way to get it is to hack the kernel to expose it (like this change). It also helped expose a bug with conditional IB speculation on certain CPUs. Another place this could be useful is to audit the system when using sanboxing. With this change, I can confirm that seccomp-enabled process have IB speculation force disabled as expected when the kernel command line parameter `spectre_v2_user=seccomp`. Since there's already a 'Speculation_Store_Bypass' field, I used that as precedent for adding this one. [amistry@google.com: remove underscores from field name to workaround documentation issue] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106131015.v2.1.I7782b0cedb705384a634cfd8898eb7523562da99@changeid Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201030172731.1.I7782b0cedb705384a634cfd8898eb7523562da99@changeid Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry Cc: Anthony Steinhauser Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Anand K Mistry Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Alexey Gladkov Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: NeilBrown Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 2 ++ fs/proc/array.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst index e5fa972d..2fa69f7 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ read the file /proc/PID/status:: NoNewPrivs: 0 Seccomp: 0 Speculation_Store_Bypass: thread vulnerable + SpeculationIndirectBranch: conditional enabled voluntary_ctxt_switches: 0 nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches: 1 @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ It's slow but very precise. NoNewPrivs no_new_privs, like prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIV, ...) Seccomp seccomp mode, like prctl(PR_GET_SECCOMP, ...) Speculation_Store_Bypass speculative store bypass mitigation status + SpeculationIndirectBranch indirect branch speculation mode Cpus_allowed mask of CPUs on which this process may run Cpus_allowed_list Same as previous, but in "list format" Mems_allowed mask of memory nodes allowed to this process diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c index a23c3e2..bb87e4d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/array.c +++ b/fs/proc/array.c @@ -369,6 +369,34 @@ static inline void task_seccomp(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p) seq_puts(m, "vulnerable"); break; } + + seq_puts(m, "\nSpeculationIndirectBranch:\t"); + switch (arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(p, PR_SPEC_INDIRECT_BRANCH)) { + case -EINVAL: + seq_puts(m, "unsupported"); + break; + case PR_SPEC_NOT_AFFECTED: + seq_puts(m, "not affected"); + break; + case PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE: + seq_puts(m, "conditional force disabled"); + break; + case PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_DISABLE: + seq_puts(m, "conditional disabled"); + break; + case PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_ENABLE: + seq_puts(m, "conditional enabled"); + break; + case PR_SPEC_ENABLE: + seq_puts(m, "always enabled"); + break; + case PR_SPEC_DISABLE: + seq_puts(m, "always disabled"); + break; + default: + seq_puts(m, "unknown"); + break; + } seq_putc(m, '\n'); } -- 2.7.4