From f96d44743a44e3332f75d23d2075bb8270900e1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:26:25 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check error value from btrfs_update_inode in tree log Error injection testing uncovered a case where we ended up with invalid link counts on an inode. This happened because we failed to notice an error when updating the inode while replaying the tree log, and committed the transaction with an invalid file system. Fix this by checking the return value of btrfs_update_inode. This resolved the link count errors I was seeing, and we already properly handle passing up the error values in these paths. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c index 375c464..e4820e8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c @@ -1574,7 +1574,9 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (ret) goto out; - btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode)); + ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode)); + if (ret) + goto out; } ref_ptr = (unsigned long)(ref_ptr + ref_struct_size) + namelen; @@ -1749,7 +1751,9 @@ static noinline int fixup_inode_link_count(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (nlink != inode->i_nlink) { set_nlink(inode, nlink); - btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode)); + ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode)); + if (ret) + goto out; } BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = (u64)-1; -- 2.7.4