From f8803919ad5c7e135af962efcbbe8c7c5310bbf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonas Paulsson Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:19:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [SystemZ] Clear NW flags on an ISD::SUB when reused as comparison. The SystemZ backend will try to reuse an existing subtraction of two values whenever they are to be compared for equality. This depends on the SystemZ subtraction instruction setting the condition code, which can also signal overflow. A later pass will remove the compare and reuse the CC from the subtraction directly. However, if that subtraction has the NSW flag set it will not include the overflow bit in the updated CC user. That was a bug which can lead to wrong results, as shown by a csmith program. Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61268 Reviewed By: nikic, uweigand Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145811 --- llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZISelLowering.cpp | 6 ++++ llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/int-cmp-62.ll | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644 llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/int-cmp-62.ll diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZISelLowering.cpp index 04ba0db..3508194 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZISelLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZISelLowering.cpp @@ -2423,6 +2423,12 @@ static void adjustForSubtraction(SelectionDAG &DAG, const SDLoc &DL, if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::SUB && ((N->getOperand(0) == C.Op0 && N->getOperand(1) == C.Op1) || (N->getOperand(0) == C.Op1 && N->getOperand(1) == C.Op0))) { + // Disable the nsw and nuw flags: the backend needs to handle + // overflow as well during comparison elimination. + SDNodeFlags Flags = N->getFlags(); + Flags.setNoSignedWrap(false); + Flags.setNoUnsignedWrap(false); + N->setFlags(Flags); C.Op0 = SDValue(N, 0); C.Op1 = DAG.getConstant(0, DL, N->getValueType(0)); return; diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/int-cmp-62.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/int-cmp-62.ll new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c57cf57 --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/int-cmp-62.ll @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=s390x-linux-gnu -mcpu=z15 | FileCheck %s +; +; Test that a CC result of a sub that can overflow is tested with the right predicate. + +define i32 @fun0(i32 %a, i32 %b, ptr %dest) { +; CHECK-LABEL: fun0 +; CHECK: s %r2, 0(%r4) +; CHECK: bner %r14 +entry: + %cur = load i32, ptr %dest + %res = sub nsw i32 %a, %cur + %cmp = icmp ne i32 %a, %cur + br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %store + +store: + store i32 %b, ptr %dest + br label %exit + +exit: + ret i32 %res +} + +define i32 @fun1(i32 %a, i32 %b, ptr %dest) { +; CHECK-LABEL: fun1 +; CHECK: s %r2, 0(%r4) +; CHECK: bner %r14 +entry: + %cur = load i32, ptr %dest + %res = sub nuw i32 %a, %cur + %cmp = icmp ne i32 %a, %cur + br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %store + +store: + store i32 %b, ptr %dest + br label %exit + +exit: + ret i32 %res +} -- 2.7.4