From f871d26807078cf4cc0a64a97ee2c6bb513a4397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:08:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix show_unhandled_signal_ratelimited usage Commit 86dca36e6ba introduced ratelimited usage for 'unhandled_signal' messages. The commit checks the ratelimit irrespective of whether the signal is handled or not, which is wrong and leads to false reports like the below in dmesg : __do_user_fault: 127 callbacks suppressed Do the ratelimit check only if the signal is unhandled. Fixes: 86dca36e6ba0 ("arm64: use private ratelimit state along with show_unhandled_signals") Cc: Vladimir Murzin Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas --- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c index a12251c..566bc4c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_undefinstr(struct pt_regs *regs) if (call_undef_hook(regs) == 0) return; - if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited() && unhandled_signal(current, SIGILL)) { + if (unhandled_signal(current, SIGILL) && show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) { pr_info("%s[%d]: undefined instruction: pc=%p\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), pc); dump_instr(KERN_INFO, regs); diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index 66bd92a..ffa36e2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void __do_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, { struct siginfo si; - if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited() && unhandled_signal(tsk, sig)) { + if (unhandled_signal(tsk, sig) && show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) { pr_info("%s[%d]: unhandled %s (%d) at 0x%08lx, esr 0x%03x\n", tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), fault_name(esr), sig, addr, esr); -- 2.7.4