From f592d281a72b19131e447a3695f5a4a114eaebff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Liu <ioeric@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 07:40:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Tune macro quality scoring for code completion.

x0.2 seems to be too much penalty, macros might be wanted in some cases;
changing to 0.5x instead. The tuning didn't affect ranking for non-macro
completions.

llvm-svn: 341449
---
 clang-tools-extra/clangd/Quality.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Quality.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Quality.cpp
index 5a9fcd2..7e0e837 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Quality.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Quality.cpp
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ float SymbolQualitySignals::evaluate() const {
     Score *= 0.8f;
     break;
   case Macro:
-    Score *= 0.2f;
+    Score *= 0.5f;
     break;
   case Unknown:
   case Constructor: // No boost constructors so they are after class types.
-- 
2.7.4