From f23930d5bcecd13c3bde0f46942a01c0c8de4117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Clark Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:33:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Note that PVIOs probably aren't worth shrinking. Note 3 possible subflags for -C if the two Unicode TODOs are done. p4raw-id: //depot/perl@27872 --- pod/perlrun.pod | 4 ++++ pod/perltodo.pod | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/pod/perlrun.pod b/pod/perlrun.pod index ee35b11..b973779 100644 --- a/pod/perlrun.pod +++ b/pod/perlrun.pod @@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ are as follows; listing the letters is equal to summing the numbers. of decreasing precedence) -- if the variables indicate UTF-8, then the selected "IOEioA" are in effect +=for todo +perltodo mentions Unicode in %ENV and filenames. I guess that these will be +options e and f (or F). + For example, C<-COE> and C<-C6> will both turn on UTF-8-ness on both STDOUT and STDERR. Repeating letters is just redundant, not cumulative nor toggling. diff --git a/pod/perltodo.pod b/pod/perltodo.pod index 83af8fe..4582de8 100644 --- a/pod/perltodo.pod +++ b/pod/perltodo.pod @@ -427,11 +427,14 @@ These tasks would need C knowledge, and roughly the level of knowledge of the perl API that comes from writing modules that use XS to interface to C. -=head2 shrink Cs +=head2 shrink Cs By removing unused elements and careful re-ordering, the structures for Cs, -Cs, Cs and Cs have recently been shrunk considerably. Cs and -Cs might have some savings to win. +Cs, Cs and Cs have recently been shrunk considerably. Cs +probably aren't worth it, as typical programs don't use more than 8, and +(at least) C uses C/C/C on a C, +so it would mean code changes to modules on CPAN. Cs might have some +savings to win. =head2 Implicit Latin 1 => Unicode translation -- 2.7.4