From f13d493d9cf772d510d78ae00bb9f4d680b3170b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neil Horman Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:04:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] netpoll: Revert napi_poll fix for bonding driver In an erlier patch I modified napi_poll so that devices with IFF_MASTER polled the per_cpu list instead of the device list for napi. I did this because the bonding driver has no napi instances to poll, it instead expects to check the slave devices napi instances, which napi_poll was unaware of. Looking at this more closely however, I now see this isn't strictly needed. As the bond driver poll_controller calls the slaves poll_controller via netpoll_poll_dev, which recursively calls poll_napi on each slave, allowing those napi instances to get serviced. The earlier patch isn't at all harmfull, its just not needed, so lets revert it to make the code cleaner. Sorry for the noise, Signed-off-by: Neil Horman Reviewed-by: WANG Cong Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/netpoll.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c index d79d221..4e98ffa 100644 --- a/net/core/netpoll.c +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c @@ -156,15 +156,8 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev) { struct napi_struct *napi; int budget = 16; - struct softnet_data *sd = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data); - struct list_head *nlist; - if (dev->flags & IFF_MASTER) - nlist = &sd->poll_list; - else - nlist = &dev->napi_list; - - list_for_each_entry(napi, nlist, dev_list) { + list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) { if (napi->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() && spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)) { budget = poll_one_napi(dev->npinfo, napi, budget); -- 2.7.4