From eeb54a14c48f543857f561556ab1fc49dc21af26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:09:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] c++: Reject some further reinterpret casts in constexpr [PR82304, PR95307] cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr had a check for reinterpret_casts from pointers (well, it checked from ADDR_EXPRs) to integral type, but that only caught such cases at the toplevel of expressions. As the comment said, it should be done even inside of the expressions, but at the point of the writing e.g. pointer differences used to be a problem. We now have POINTER_DIFF_EXPR, so this is no longer an issue. Had to do it just for CONVERT_EXPR, because the FE emits NOP_EXPR casts from pointers to integrals in various spots, e.g. for the PMR & 1 tests, though on NOP_EXPR we have the REINTERPRET_CAST_P bit that we do check, while on CONVERT_EXPR we don't. 2020-06-04 Jakub Jelinek PR c++/82304 PR c++/95307 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Diagnose CONVERT_EXPR conversions from pointer types to arithmetic types here... (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): ... instead of here. * g++.dg/template/pr79650.C: Expect different diagnostics and expect it on all lines that do pointer to integer casts. * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-shift1.C: Expect different diagnostics. * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-95307.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/constexpr.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-95307.C | 5 +++++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C | 14 ++++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-shift1.C | 4 ++-- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr79650.C | 10 +++++----- 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-95307.C create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c index 959f025..c7d17e9 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c @@ -6210,6 +6210,18 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, if (VOID_TYPE_P (type)) return void_node; + if (TREE_CODE (t) == CONVERT_EXPR + && ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P (type) + && INDIRECT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op))) + { + if (!ctx->quiet) + error_at (loc, + "conversion from pointer type %qT to arithmetic type " + "%qT in a constant expression", TREE_TYPE (op), type); + *non_constant_p = true; + return t; + } + if (TREE_CODE (op) == PTRMEM_CST && !TYPE_PTRMEM_P (type)) op = cplus_expand_constant (op); @@ -6811,19 +6823,6 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool allow_non_constant, non_constant_p = true; } - /* Technically we should check this for all subexpressions, but that - runs into problems with our internal representation of pointer - subtraction and the 5.19 rules are still in flux. */ - if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (TREE_CODE (r)) - && ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (r)) - && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (r, 0)) == ADDR_EXPR) - { - if (!allow_non_constant) - error ("conversion from pointer type %qT " - "to arithmetic type %qT in a constant expression", - TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (r, 0)), TREE_TYPE (r)); - non_constant_p = true; - } if (!non_constant_p && overflow_p) non_constant_p = true; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-95307.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-95307.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bd3c6a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-95307.C @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +// PR c++/95307 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +int v; +constexpr auto p{reinterpret_cast<__UINTPTR_TYPE__>(&v) - 1u}; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b05243 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +// PR c++/82304 +// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } } + +typedef __UINTPTR_TYPE__ uintptr_t; + +constexpr const char * +foo (const char *p) +{ + auto l = reinterpret_cast(p); // { dg-error "conversion from pointer" } + ++l; + return reinterpret_cast(l); +} + +constexpr auto s = foo ("Hello"); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-shift1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-shift1.C index d63c954..e0e56e2 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-shift1.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-shift1.C @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ constexpr int p = 1; constexpr __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ bar (int a) { - return ((__PTRDIFF_TYPE__) &p) << a; // { dg-error "is not a constant expression" } + return ((__PTRDIFF_TYPE__) &p) << a; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer" } } constexpr __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ r = bar (2); // { dg-message "in .constexpr. expansion of" } -constexpr __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ s = bar (0); // { dg-error "conversion from pointer" } +constexpr __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ s = bar (0); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr79650.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr79650.C index 72c7814..11d28c5 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr79650.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr79650.C @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ foo () static int a, b; lab1: lab2: - A<(intptr_t)&&lab1 - (__INTPTR_TYPE__)&&lab2> c; // { dg-error "not a constant integer" } - A<(intptr_t)&&lab1 - (__INTPTR_TYPE__)&&lab1> d; - A<(intptr_t)&a - (intptr_t)&b> e; // { dg-error "is not a constant expression" } - A<(intptr_t)&a - (intptr_t)&a> f; - A<(intptr_t)sizeof(a) + (intptr_t)&a> g; // { dg-error "not a constant integer" } + A<(intptr_t)&&lab1 - (__INTPTR_TYPE__)&&lab2> c; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } + A<(intptr_t)&&lab1 - (__INTPTR_TYPE__)&&lab1> d; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } + A<(intptr_t)&a - (intptr_t)&b> e; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } + A<(intptr_t)&a - (intptr_t)&a> f; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } + A<(intptr_t)sizeof(a) + (intptr_t)&a> g; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } A<(intptr_t)&a> h; // { dg-error "conversion from pointer type" } } -- 2.7.4