From eccc85ddc23e0bc8bcbfdf9bf4ce865f5b77bd62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan <Tornhoof@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:05:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add missing 'if' in summary comment (dotnet/corefx#37136)

Add missing 'if' in summary comment

Commit migrated from https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/commit/7a60f1e1ef6080e0f29e007ae6218043abdef3ad
---
 .../src/System/Threading/Channels/ChannelOptions.cs                   | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/libraries/System.Threading.Channels/src/System/Threading/Channels/ChannelOptions.cs b/src/libraries/System.Threading.Channels/src/System/Threading/Channels/ChannelOptions.cs
index a949c60..2091df3 100644
--- a/src/libraries/System.Threading.Channels/src/System/Threading/Channels/ChannelOptions.cs
+++ b/src/libraries/System.Threading.Channels/src/System/Threading/Channels/ChannelOptions.cs
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ namespace System.Threading.Channels
         public bool SingleWriter { get; set; }
 
         /// <summary>
-        /// <code>true</code> readers from the channel guarantee that there will only ever be at most one read operation at a time;
-        /// <code>false</code> if no such constraint is guaranteed.
+        /// <code>true</code> if readers from the channel guarantee that there will only ever be at most one read operation
+        /// at a time; <code>false</code> if no such constraint is guaranteed.
         /// </summary>
         /// <remarks>
         /// If true, the channel may be able to optimize certain operations based on knowing about the single-reader guarantee.
-- 
2.7.4