From ea4cd4d8aa648ee634ea994c93c2a2264fee3417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Stenberg Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:56:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] -Wno-format-nonliteral does not exist in my gcc 2.96, only use that with newer versions --- configure.ac | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 1ea6900..ce84cba 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ AC_HELP_STRING([--disable-debug],[Disable debug options]), dnl we only like gcc less than 5.0, since if it is above that it is dnl likely just a compiler that looks like gcc (like icc 8.0)! dnl here's the standard setup - WARN="-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-format-nonliteral -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare" + WARN="-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare" dnl -Wcast-align is a bit too annoying ;-) @@ -1211,6 +1211,11 @@ AC_HELP_STRING([--disable-debug],[Disable debug options]), dnl gcc 2.96 or later WARN="$WARN -Wfloat-equal" + if test "$gccnum" -gt "296"; then + dnl this option does not exist in 2.96 + WARN="$WARN -Wno-format-nonliteral" + fi + dnl -Wunreachable-code seems totally unreliable on my gcc 3.3.2 on dnl on i686-Linux as it gives us heaps with false positives if test "$gccnum" -ge "303"; then -- 2.7.4