From e6ec716f0ddbe51741ef261d0804f0c28038dda4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miao Xie Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:38:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: make raid attr array more readable The current code of raid attr arry is hard to understand and it is easy to introduce some problem if we modify the array. So I changed it and made it more readable. Cc: Liu Bo Signed-off-by: Miao Xie Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 10 +++++++++- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 22 +++++++++------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index 9ee099f..541ce9a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -953,7 +953,15 @@ struct btrfs_dev_replace_item { #define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP (1ULL << 5) #define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 (1ULL << 6) #define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RESERVED BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE -#define BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES 5 + +enum btrfs_raid_types { + BTRFS_RAID_RAID10, + BTRFS_RAID_RAID1, + BTRFS_RAID_DUP, + BTRFS_RAID_RAID0, + BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE, + BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES +}; #define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA | \ BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | \ diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 82400b2..174c4d5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -5545,20 +5545,16 @@ wait_block_group_cache_done(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache) int __get_raid_index(u64 flags) { - int index; - if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) - index = 0; + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID10; else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) - index = 1; + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1; else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) - index = 2; + return BTRFS_RAID_DUP; else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) - index = 3; + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID0; else - index = 4; - - return index; + return BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE; } static int get_block_group_index(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache) @@ -7518,16 +7514,16 @@ int btrfs_can_relocate(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr) index = get_block_group_index(block_group); } - if (index == 0) { + if (index == BTRFS_RAID_RAID10) { dev_min = 4; /* Divide by 2 */ min_free >>= 1; - } else if (index == 1) { + } else if (index == BTRFS_RAID_RAID1) { dev_min = 2; - } else if (index == 2) { + } else if (index == BTRFS_RAID_DUP) { /* Multiply by 2 */ min_free <<= 1; - } else if (index == 3) { + } else if (index == BTRFS_RAID_RAID0) { dev_min = fs_devices->rw_devices; do_div(min_free, dev_min); } diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 5349e17..1ce581d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -3562,13 +3562,48 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_device_info(const void *a, const void *b) } struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = { - { 2, 1, 0, 4, 2, 2 /* raid10 */ }, - { 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2 /* raid1 */ }, - { 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2 /* dup */ }, - { 1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 1 /* raid0 */ }, - { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 /* single */ }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID10] = { + .sub_stripes = 2, + .dev_stripes = 1, + .devs_max = 0, /* 0 == as many as possible */ + .devs_min = 4, + .devs_increment = 2, + .ncopies = 2, + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = { + .sub_stripes = 1, + .dev_stripes = 1, + .devs_max = 2, + .devs_min = 2, + .devs_increment = 2, + .ncopies = 2, + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = { + .sub_stripes = 1, + .dev_stripes = 2, + .devs_max = 1, + .devs_min = 1, + .devs_increment = 1, + .ncopies = 2, + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = { + .sub_stripes = 1, + .dev_stripes = 1, + .devs_max = 0, + .devs_min = 2, + .devs_increment = 1, + .ncopies = 1, + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = { + .sub_stripes = 1, + .dev_stripes = 1, + .devs_max = 1, + .devs_min = 1, + .devs_increment = 1, + .ncopies = 1, + }, }; - + static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *extent_root, struct map_lookup **map_ret, -- 2.7.4