From e454b2d480c4ef875cd0800b12a0b4cd37821cb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:55:16 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] i965: Assert that relayout laid out something that won't need it again. The ETC1 changes failed at this, so let's make sure it will be caught in testing next time. Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c index 2f1b354..3f21601 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c @@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ intel_finalize_mipmap_tree(struct intel_context *intel, GLuint unit) if (intelObj->mt != intelImage->mt) { intel_miptree_copy_teximage(intel, intelImage, intelObj->mt); } + + /* After we're done, we'd better agree that our layout is + * appropriate, or we'll end up hitting this function again on the + * next draw + */ + assert(intel_miptree_match_image(intelObj->mt, &intelImage->base.Base)); } } -- 2.7.4