From deb3b17b03a6206093dd96039999c9043cb27c41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:15:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Merge TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED and TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED cases. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/infrun.c | 52 +--------------------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 994556d..e1fe332 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ 2002-12-15 Daniel Jacobowitz + * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Merge TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED + and TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED cases. + +2002-12-15 Daniel Jacobowitz + * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Assume that catchpoints are not affected by DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK. diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index 2aaab67..043607a 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -1326,63 +1326,13 @@ handle_inferior_event (struct execution_control_state *ecs) /* The following are the only cases in which we keep going; the above cases end in a continue or goto. */ case TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED: + case TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED: stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP; pending_follow.kind = ecs->ws.kind; pending_follow.fork_event.parent_pid = PIDGET (ecs->ptid); pending_follow.fork_event.child_pid = ecs->ws.value.related_pid; - stop_pc = read_pc_pid (ecs->ptid); - ecs->saved_inferior_ptid = inferior_ptid; - inferior_ptid = ecs->ptid; - - /* Assume that catchpoints are not really software breakpoints. If - some future target implements them using software breakpoints then - that target is responsible for fudging DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK. Thus - we pass 1 for the NOT_A_SW_BREAKPOINT argument, so that - bpstat_stop_status will not decrement the PC. */ - - stop_bpstat = bpstat_stop_status (&stop_pc, 1); - - ecs->random_signal = !bpstat_explains_signal (stop_bpstat); - inferior_ptid = ecs->saved_inferior_ptid; - goto process_event_stop_test; - - /* If this a platform which doesn't allow a debugger to touch a - vfork'd inferior until after it exec's, then we'd best keep - our fingers entirely off the inferior, other than continuing - it. This has the unfortunate side-effect that catchpoints - of vforks will be ignored. But since the platform doesn't - allow the inferior be touched at vfork time, there's really - little choice. */ - case TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED: - stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP; - pending_follow.kind = ecs->ws.kind; - - /* Is this a vfork of the parent? If so, then give any - vfork catchpoints a chance to trigger now. (It's - dangerous to do so if the child canot be touched until - it execs, and the child has not yet exec'd. We probably - should warn the user to that effect when the catchpoint - triggers...) */ - if (ptid_equal (ecs->ptid, inferior_ptid)) - { - pending_follow.fork_event.parent_pid = PIDGET (ecs->ptid); - pending_follow.fork_event.child_pid = ecs->ws.value.related_pid; - } - - /* If we've seen the child's vfork event but cannot really touch - the child until it execs, then we must continue the child now. - Else, give any vfork catchpoints a chance to trigger now. */ - else - { - pending_follow.fork_event.child_pid = PIDGET (ecs->ptid); - pending_follow.fork_event.parent_pid = ecs->ws.value.related_pid; - target_post_startup_inferior (pid_to_ptid - (pending_follow.fork_event. - child_pid)); - } - stop_pc = read_pc (); /* Assume that catchpoints are not really software breakpoints. If -- 2.7.4