From dea5c24a14047b7d6b6b269434a85ffd05f1d2cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rui Salvaterra Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 22:05:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] lib: lz4: cleanup unaligned access efficiency detection These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition. Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- lib/lz4/lz4defs.h | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h index 0710a62ad2f6..c79d7ea8a38e 100644 --- a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h +++ b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h @@ -24,9 +24,7 @@ typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S; typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S; typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S; -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \ - || defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \ - && defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) #define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v) #define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v) -- 2.34.1