From ddbc077895ba52c2c93679f846d37e1c06f90f74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Parker Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:17:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][ARM] Make some params members instead. Add MachineLoopInfo and ReachingDefAnalysis as members of LowOverheadLoop instead of passing them several times to different methods. --- llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLowOverheadLoops.cpp | 34 +++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLowOverheadLoops.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLowOverheadLoops.cpp index f1b31f1..132a8ac 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLowOverheadLoops.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLowOverheadLoops.cpp @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ namespace { struct LowOverheadLoop { MachineLoop *ML = nullptr; + MachineLoopInfo *MLI = nullptr; + ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA = nullptr; MachineFunction *MF = nullptr; MachineInstr *InsertPt = nullptr; MachineInstr *Start = nullptr; @@ -189,7 +191,8 @@ namespace { bool Revert = false; bool CannotTailPredicate = false; - LowOverheadLoop(MachineLoop *ML) : ML(ML) { + LowOverheadLoop(MachineLoop *ML, MachineLoopInfo *MLI, + ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA) : ML(ML), MLI(MLI), RDA(RDA) { MF = ML->getHeader()->getParent(); } @@ -209,19 +212,16 @@ namespace { !CannotTailPredicate && ML->getNumBlocks() == 1; } - bool ValidateTailPredicate(MachineInstr *StartInsertPt, - ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA, - MachineLoopInfo *MLI); + bool ValidateTailPredicate(MachineInstr *StartInsertPt); // Is it safe to define LR with DLS/WLS? // LR can be defined if it is the operand to start, because it's the same // value, or if it's going to be equivalent to the operand to Start. - MachineInstr *IsSafeToDefineLR(ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA); + MachineInstr *IsSafeToDefineLR(); // Check the branch targets are within range and we satisfy our // restrictions. - void CheckLegality(ARMBasicBlockUtils *BBUtils, ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA, - MachineLoopInfo *MLI); + void CheckLegality(ARMBasicBlockUtils *BBUtils); bool FoundAllComponents() const { return Start && Dec && End; @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ char ARMLowOverheadLoops::ID = 0; INITIALIZE_PASS(ARMLowOverheadLoops, DEBUG_TYPE, ARM_LOW_OVERHEAD_LOOPS_NAME, false, false) -MachineInstr *LowOverheadLoop::IsSafeToDefineLR(ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA) { +MachineInstr *LowOverheadLoop::IsSafeToDefineLR() { // We can define LR because LR already contains the same value. if (Start->getOperand(0).getReg() == ARM::LR) return Start; @@ -412,9 +412,7 @@ static bool IsSafeToRemove(MachineInstr *MI, ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA, return true; } -bool LowOverheadLoop::ValidateTailPredicate(MachineInstr *StartInsertPt, - ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA, - MachineLoopInfo *MLI) { +bool LowOverheadLoop::ValidateTailPredicate(MachineInstr *StartInsertPt) { assert(VCTP && "VCTP instruction expected but is not set"); // All predication within the loop should be based on vctp. If the block // isn't predicated on entry, check whether the vctp is within the block @@ -482,7 +480,7 @@ bool LowOverheadLoop::ValidateTailPredicate(MachineInstr *StartInsertPt, // Especially in the case of while loops, InsertBB may not be the // preheader, so we need to check that the register isn't redefined // before entering the loop. - auto CannotProvideElements = [&RDA](MachineBasicBlock *MBB, + auto CannotProvideElements = [this](MachineBasicBlock *MBB, Register NumElements) { // NumElements is redefined in this block. if (RDA->getReachingDef(&MBB->back(), NumElements) >= 0) @@ -563,9 +561,7 @@ bool LowOverheadLoop::ValidateTailPredicate(MachineInstr *StartInsertPt, return true; } -void LowOverheadLoop::CheckLegality(ARMBasicBlockUtils *BBUtils, - ReachingDefAnalysis *RDA, - MachineLoopInfo *MLI) { +void LowOverheadLoop::CheckLegality(ARMBasicBlockUtils *BBUtils) { if (Revert) return; @@ -598,7 +594,7 @@ void LowOverheadLoop::CheckLegality(ARMBasicBlockUtils *BBUtils, return; } - InsertPt = Revert ? nullptr : IsSafeToDefineLR(RDA); + InsertPt = Revert ? nullptr : IsSafeToDefineLR(); if (!InsertPt) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "ARM Loops: Unable to find safe insertion point.\n"); Revert = true; @@ -615,7 +611,7 @@ void LowOverheadLoop::CheckLegality(ARMBasicBlockUtils *BBUtils, assert(ML->getBlocks().size() == 1 && "Shouldn't be processing a loop with more than one block"); - CannotTailPredicate = !ValidateTailPredicate(InsertPt, RDA, MLI); + CannotTailPredicate = !ValidateTailPredicate(InsertPt); LLVM_DEBUG(if (CannotTailPredicate) dbgs() << "ARM Loops: Couldn't validate tail predicate.\n"); } @@ -750,7 +746,7 @@ bool ARMLowOverheadLoops::ProcessLoop(MachineLoop *ML) { return nullptr; }; - LowOverheadLoop LoLoop(ML); + LowOverheadLoop LoLoop(ML, MLI, RDA); // Search the preheader for the start intrinsic. // FIXME: I don't see why we shouldn't be supporting multiple predecessors // with potentially multiple set.loop.iterations, so we need to enable this. @@ -805,7 +801,7 @@ bool ARMLowOverheadLoops::ProcessLoop(MachineLoop *ML) { LoLoop.ToRemove.insert(Remove.begin(), Remove.end()); } - LoLoop.CheckLegality(BBUtils.get(), RDA, MLI); + LoLoop.CheckLegality(BBUtils.get()); Expand(LoLoop); return true; } -- 2.7.4