From dd3db3eaa87f82091b08f23c14452f5cc62f08a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: raster Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:49:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] hey cedric - i left this commented out, but this 2nd queue is wrong as the first handles cleaning up the direct worker. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.enlightenment.org/var/svn/e/trunk/ecore@69098 7cbeb6ba-43b4-40fd-8cce-4c39aea84d33 --- src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c b/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c index 51afde6..901d4b3 100644 --- a/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c +++ b/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c @@ -573,7 +573,8 @@ _ecore_direct_worker(Ecore_Pthread_Worker *work) LKI(work->mutex); CDI(work->cond, work->mutex); - ecore_main_loop_thread_safe_call_async(_ecore_thread_handler, work); +// don't queue this - this is deleted by _ecore_thread_kill() already deleting work->u.feedback_run.direct_worker +// ecore_main_loop_thread_safe_call_async(_ecore_thread_handler, work); return NULL; } @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ ecore_thread_feedback_run(Ecore_Thread_Cb func_heavy, worker->u.feedback_run.direct_worker = NULL; - if (!try_no_queue) + if (try_no_queue) { PH(t); -- 2.7.4