From dc1be3eb33c7f37ac45ad0ccf5be063134a513be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:21:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Tweak gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c for CRIS tm.texi says for BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (from which __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ is derived): "Biggest alignment that any data type can require on this machine, in bits." That is, using that value might be too strict for alignment of *functions* and CRIS requires at least 16-bit alignment for functions. But, one purpose of the test is to test that alignment can be set to a large but valid value, so pick 512, which has some use as a historically required alignment for certain I/O descriptors. * gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c: Adjust comment for ALIGN_MAX_STATIC. (ALIGN_MAX_STATIC): Set to 512 for CRIS. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c index 887bdd0..4f0c885 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-aligned.c @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ # else # define ALIGN_MAX_STATIC ALIGN_MAX_HARD # endif +#elif __CRIS__ +/* __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ doesn't cover functions (16 bits for CRIS). */ +# define ALIGN_MAX_STATIC 512 +# define ALIGN_TOO_BIG_OFILE (ALIGN_MAX_HARD << 1) #elif pdp11 # define ALIGN_MAX_STATIC 2 /* Work around a pdp11 ICE (see PR target/87821). */ @@ -29,7 +33,9 @@ /* Is this processor- or operating-system specific? */ # define ALIGN_MAX_STATIC ALIGN_MAX_HARD #else - /* Guaranteed to be accepted regardless of the target. */ + /* Guaranteed to be accepted regardless of the target for objects. + This might not be true for alignment of functions though, so + may need to be set to a target-specific value above. */ # define ALIGN_MAX_STATIC __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ /* Guaranteed to be rejected regardless of the target. */ # define ALIGN_TOO_BIG_OFILE (ALIGN_MAX_HARD << 1) -- 2.7.4