From da67227bfc407dd1412b3396ed962f30084f9401 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:54:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ipa: Various diagnostic fixes [PR93797] As the patch shows, various messages didn't match the field names they are talking about. 2020-02-18 Jakub Jelinek PR ipa/93797 * cgraph.c (verify_speculative_call): Use speculative_id instead of speculative_uid in messages. Remove trailing whitespace from error message. Use num_speculative_call_targets instead of num_speculative_targets in a message. (cgraph_node::verify_node): Use call_stmt instead of cal_stmt in edge messages and stmt instead of cal_stmt in reference message. --- gcc/ChangeLog | 8 ++++++++ gcc/cgraph.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 99d32c0..efc2116 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@ 2020-02-18 Jakub Jelinek + PR ipa/93797 + * cgraph.c (verify_speculative_call): Use speculative_id instead of + speculative_uid in messages. Remove trailing whitespace from error + message. Use num_speculative_call_targets instead of + num_speculative_targets in a message. + (cgraph_node::verify_node): Use call_stmt instead of cal_stmt in + edge messages and stmt instead of cal_stmt in reference message. + PR tree-optimization/93780 * tree-ssa.c (non_rewritable_lvalue_p): Check valid_vector_subparts_p before calling build_vector_type. diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.c b/gcc/cgraph.c index 294b2d3..c420863 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraph.c +++ b/gcc/cgraph.c @@ -3230,14 +3230,14 @@ verify_speculative_call (struct cgraph_node *node, gimple *stmt, if (direct->speculative_id >= num) { error ("direct call to %s in speculative call sequence has " - "speculative_uid %i out of range", + "speculative_id %i out of range", direct->callee->dump_name (), direct->speculative_id); return true; } if (direct_calls[direct->speculative_id]) { error ("duplicate direct call to %s in speculative call sequence " - "with speculative_uid %i", + "with speculative_id %i", direct->callee->dump_name (), direct->speculative_id); return true; } @@ -3248,7 +3248,7 @@ verify_speculative_call (struct cgraph_node *node, gimple *stmt, && first_call != node->get_edge (first_call->call_stmt)) { error ("call stmt hash does not point to first direct edge of " - "speculative call sequence "); + "speculative call sequence"); return true; } @@ -3260,14 +3260,14 @@ verify_speculative_call (struct cgraph_node *node, gimple *stmt, if (ref->speculative_id >= num) { error ("direct call to %s in speculative call sequence has " - "speculative_uid %i out of range", + "speculative_id %i out of range", ref->referred->dump_name (), ref->speculative_id); return true; } if (refs[ref->speculative_id]) { error ("duplicate reference %s in speculative call sequence " - "with speculative_uid %i", + "with speculative_id %i", ref->referred->dump_name (), ref->speculative_id); return true; } @@ -3294,7 +3294,7 @@ verify_speculative_call (struct cgraph_node *node, gimple *stmt, if (num_targets != indirect->num_speculative_call_targets_p ()) { error ("number of speculative targets %i mismatched with " - "num_speculative_targets %i", + "num_speculative_call_targets %i", num_targets, indirect->num_speculative_call_targets_p ()); return true; @@ -3400,7 +3400,7 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void) } if (e->call_stmt && e->lto_stmt_uid) { - error ("edge has both cal_stmt and lto_stmt_uid set"); + error ("edge has both call_stmt and lto_stmt_uid set"); error_found = true; } } @@ -3471,7 +3471,7 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void) } if (e->call_stmt && e->lto_stmt_uid) { - error ("edge has both cal_stmt and lto_stmt_uid set"); + error ("edge has both call_stmt and lto_stmt_uid set"); error_found = true; } if (e->speculative @@ -3509,7 +3509,7 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void) { if (ref->stmt && ref->lto_stmt_uid) { - error ("reference has both cal_stmt and lto_stmt_uid set"); + error ("reference has both stmt and lto_stmt_uid set"); error_found = true; } if (ref->speculative -- 2.7.4