From d92ab7b1561f46612e2985aef1938d31d18d5696 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steffen Klassert Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:49:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: Refuse to insert 32 bit userspace socket policies on 64 bit systems commit 19d7df69fdb2636856dc8919de72fc1bf8f79598 upstream. We don't have a compat layer for xfrm, so userspace and kernel structures have different sizes in this case. This results in a broken configuration, so refuse to configure socket policies when trying to insert from 32 bit userspace as we do it already with policies inserted via netlink. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e1a1577ca8bcb47b769a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert [use is_compat_task() - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c index 96d664e..34b5b4b 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -1845,6 +1845,11 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, u8 __user *optval, int optlen struct xfrm_mgr *km; struct xfrm_policy *pol = NULL; +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (is_compat_task()) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +#endif + if (!optval && !optlen) { xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, NULL); xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, NULL); -- 2.7.4