From d82bd1229885d550d03926cfa937703f6caa3cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Westphal Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:08:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tcp: move TCP_ECN_create_request out of header After Octavian Purdilas tcp ipv4/ipv6 unification work this helper only has a single callsite. While at it, convert name to lowercase, suggested by Stephen. Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/net/tcp.h | 34 ---------------------------------- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h index 1f57c53..545a79a 100644 --- a/include/net/tcp.h +++ b/include/net/tcp.h @@ -861,40 +861,6 @@ static inline void tcp_ca_event(struct sock *sk, const enum tcp_ca_event event) icsk->icsk_ca_ops->cwnd_event(sk, event); } -/* RFC3168 : 6.1.1 SYN packets must not have ECT/ECN bits set - * - * If we receive a SYN packet with these bits set, it means a - * network is playing bad games with TOS bits. In order to - * avoid possible false congestion notifications, we disable - * TCP ECN negociation. - * - * Exception: tcp_ca wants ECN. This is required for DCTCP - * congestion control; it requires setting ECT on all packets, - * including SYN. We inverse the test in this case: If our - * local socket wants ECN, but peer only set ece/cwr (but not - * ECT in IP header) its probably a non-DCTCP aware sender. - */ -static inline void -TCP_ECN_create_request(struct request_sock *req, const struct sk_buff *skb, - const struct sock *listen_sk) -{ - const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb); - const struct net *net = sock_net(listen_sk); - bool th_ecn = th->ece && th->cwr; - bool ect, need_ecn; - - if (!th_ecn) - return; - - ect = !INET_ECN_is_not_ect(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield); - need_ecn = tcp_ca_needs_ecn(listen_sk); - - if (!ect && !need_ecn && net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn) - inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1; - else if (ect && need_ecn) - inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1; -} - /* These functions determine how the current flow behaves in respect of SACK * handling. SACK is negotiated with the peer, and therefore it can vary * between different flows. diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index fc13317..174181e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -5906,6 +5906,40 @@ static inline void pr_drop_req(struct request_sock *req, __u16 port, int family) #endif } +/* RFC3168 : 6.1.1 SYN packets must not have ECT/ECN bits set + * + * If we receive a SYN packet with these bits set, it means a + * network is playing bad games with TOS bits. In order to + * avoid possible false congestion notifications, we disable + * TCP ECN negociation. + * + * Exception: tcp_ca wants ECN. This is required for DCTCP + * congestion control; it requires setting ECT on all packets, + * including SYN. We inverse the test in this case: If our + * local socket wants ECN, but peer only set ece/cwr (but not + * ECT in IP header) its probably a non-DCTCP aware sender. + */ +static void tcp_ecn_create_request(struct request_sock *req, + const struct sk_buff *skb, + const struct sock *listen_sk) +{ + const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb); + const struct net *net = sock_net(listen_sk); + bool th_ecn = th->ece && th->cwr; + bool ect, need_ecn; + + if (!th_ecn) + return; + + ect = !INET_ECN_is_not_ect(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield); + need_ecn = tcp_ca_needs_ecn(listen_sk); + + if (!ect && !need_ecn && net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn) + inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1; + else if (ect && need_ecn) + inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1; +} + int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops, const struct tcp_request_sock_ops *af_ops, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) @@ -5966,7 +6000,7 @@ int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops, goto drop_and_free; if (!want_cookie || tmp_opt.tstamp_ok) - TCP_ECN_create_request(req, skb, sk); + tcp_ecn_create_request(req, skb, sk); if (want_cookie) { isn = cookie_init_sequence(af_ops, sk, skb, &req->mss); -- 2.7.4