From d7507aa1b988efd788846d62021e581bfca31ace Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:30:51 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make HS400 tuning follow as per recommeneded HW sequence During tuning execution for HS400 mode, HW sequence recommends to select MCLK_SEL/2(0x3) in VENDOR_SPEC & sdhc msm clock at GCC to be 400MHZ (nearest supported clk). Add this change in tuning sequence during HS400 tuning. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani Tested-by: Jeremy McNicoll Acked-by: Adrian Hunter Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c index 84d29dd..fa9bce3 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c @@ -151,7 +151,8 @@ static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, */ if (ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 || ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52 || - ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400) + ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 || + host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING) clock *= 2; return clock; } @@ -611,7 +612,8 @@ void sdhci_msm_hc_select_mode(struct sdhci_host *host) { struct mmc_ios ios = host->mmc->ios; - if (ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400) + if (ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 || + host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING) msm_hc_select_hs400(host); else msm_hc_select_default(host); @@ -831,6 +833,16 @@ static int sdhci_msm_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode) ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)) return 0; + /* + * For HS400 tuning in HS200 timing requires: + * - select MCLK/2 in VENDOR_SPEC + * - program MCLK to 400MHz (or nearest supported) in GCC + */ + if (host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING) { + sdhci_msm_hc_select_mode(host); + msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(host, ios.clock); + } + retry: /* First of all reset the tuning block */ rc = msm_init_cm_dll(host); -- 2.7.4