From d6977cf92fb222e42ef785bee226011fdcb2d5cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Clasen Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 19:29:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Typo fixes. * glib/tmpl/memory.sgml: Typo fixes. --- docs/reference/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ docs/reference/glib/tmpl/memory.sgml | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/ChangeLog b/docs/reference/ChangeLog index d4b5b1d..869fa3a 100644 --- a/docs/reference/ChangeLog +++ b/docs/reference/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2001-12-14 Matthias Clasen + + * glib/tmpl/memory.sgml: Typo fixes. + 2001-12-13 Matthias Clasen * glib/tmpl/completion.sgml, glib/tmpl/date.sgml, diff --git a/docs/reference/glib/tmpl/memory.sgml b/docs/reference/glib/tmpl/memory.sgml index 4c0b2c1..0510f15 100644 --- a/docs/reference/glib/tmpl/memory.sgml +++ b/docs/reference/glib/tmpl/memory.sgml @@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ Thus it provides the same advantages and pitfalls as alloca() - + It doesn't cause any memory fragmentation, within its scope, seperate alloca() + + It doesn't cause any memory fragmentation, within its scope, separate alloca() blocks just build up and are released together at function end. - Allocation sizes have to fit into the current stack frame. For instance in a threaded environment on Linux, the per-thread stack size is limited to 2 Megabytes, - so be sparse with alloca() uses. + so be sparse with alloca() uses. - Allocation failure due to insufficient stack space is not indicated with a %NULL -- 2.7.4