From d3f2ed520b51f06d4f3c8c96bd4ba6e7e57643a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Pinkava Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:56:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: remove meaningless delay from nand_unlock This delay is meaningless. If delay is needed it is device specific and must be reimplemented by specific driver, otherwise no delay is needed. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava Acked-by: Vimal Singh Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 422e787..e57ea83 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -915,7 +915,6 @@ static int __nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, /* Call wait ready function */ status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip); - udelay(1000); /* See if device thinks it succeeded */ if (status & 0x01) { DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Error status = 0x%08x\n", @@ -1024,7 +1023,6 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) /* Call wait ready function */ status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip); - udelay(1000); /* See if device thinks it succeeded */ if (status & 0x01) { DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Error status = 0x%08x\n", -- 2.7.4