From d3bbe7a0c8af16f3fab8b1bbe2f9d96e66818c27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Alves Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:26:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * mem-break.c (struct raw_breakpoint): New field shlib_disabled. (set_gdb_breakpoint_at): If GDB is inserting a breakpoint on top of another, then delete the previous, and validate all breakpoints. (validate_inserted_breakpoint): New. (delete_disabled_breakpoints): New. (validate_breakpoints): New. (check_mem_read): Validate breakpoints before trusting their shadow. Delete disabled breakpoints. (check_mem_write): Validate breakpoints before trusting they should be inserted. Delete disabled breakpoints. * mem-break.h (validate_breakpoints): * server.c (handle_query): Validate breakpoints when we see a qSymbol query. --- gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog | 17 ++++++++ gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.h | 4 ++ gdb/gdbserver/server.c | 12 ++++++ 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog b/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog index eb6c0ba..21ea7c6 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,22 @@ 2010-04-01 Pedro Alves + * mem-break.c (struct raw_breakpoint): New field shlib_disabled. + (set_gdb_breakpoint_at): If GDB is inserting a breakpoint on top + of another, then delete the previous, and validate all + breakpoints. + (validate_inserted_breakpoint): New. + (delete_disabled_breakpoints): New. + (validate_breakpoints): New. + (check_mem_read): Validate breakpoints before trusting their + shadow. Delete disabled breakpoints. + (check_mem_write): Validate breakpoints before trusting they + should be inserted. Delete disabled breakpoints. + * mem-break.h (validate_breakpoints): + * server.c (handle_query): Validate breakpoints when we see a + qSymbol query. + +2010-04-01 Pedro Alves + * linux-low.c (linux_wait_1): Avoid setting need_step_over is there's a GDB breakpoint at stop_pc. Always report a trap to GDB if we could tell there's a GDB breakpoint at stop_pc. diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.c b/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.c index 5256cb7..aa2f32f 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.c +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.c @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct raw_breakpoint /* Non-zero if this breakpoint is currently inserted in the inferior. */ int inserted; + + /* Non-zero if this breakpoint is currently disabled because we no + longer detect it as inserted. */ + int shlib_disabled; }; /* The type of a breakpoint. */ @@ -326,6 +330,24 @@ set_gdb_breakpoint_at (CORE_ADDR where) if (breakpoint_data == NULL) return 1; + /* If we see GDB inserting a second breakpoint at the same address, + then the first breakpoint must have disappeared due to a shared + library unload. On targets where the shared libraries are + handled by userspace, like SVR4, for example, GDBserver can't + tell if a library was loaded or unloaded. Since we refcount + breakpoints, if we didn't do this, we'd just increase the + refcount of the previous breakpoint at this address, but the trap + was not planted in the inferior anymore, thus the breakpoint + would never be hit. */ + bp = find_gdb_breakpoint_at (where); + if (bp != NULL) + { + delete_gdb_breakpoint_at (where); + + /* Might as well validate all other breakpoints. */ + validate_breakpoints (); + } + bp = set_breakpoint_at (where, NULL); if (bp == NULL) return -1; @@ -537,12 +559,70 @@ breakpoint_inserted_here (CORE_ADDR addr) return (bp != NULL && bp->inserted); } +static int +validate_inserted_breakpoint (struct raw_breakpoint *bp) +{ + unsigned char *buf; + int err; + + gdb_assert (bp->inserted); + + buf = alloca (breakpoint_len); + err = (*the_target->read_memory) (bp->pc, buf, breakpoint_len); + if (err || memcmp (buf, breakpoint_data, breakpoint_len) != 0) + { + /* Tag it as gone. */ + bp->inserted = 0; + bp->shlib_disabled = 1; + return 0; + } + + return 1; +} + +static void +delete_disabled_breakpoints (void) +{ + struct process_info *proc = current_process (); + struct breakpoint *bp, *next; + + for (bp = proc->breakpoints; bp != NULL; bp = next) + { + next = bp->next; + if (bp->raw->shlib_disabled) + delete_breakpoint_1 (proc, bp); + } +} + +/* Check if breakpoints we inserted still appear to be inserted. They + may disappear due to a shared library unload, and worse, a new + shared library may be reloaded at the same address as the + previously unloaded one. If that happens, we should make sure that + the shadow memory of the old breakpoints isn't used when reading or + writing memory. */ + +void +validate_breakpoints (void) +{ + struct process_info *proc = current_process (); + struct breakpoint *bp; + + for (bp = proc->breakpoints; bp != NULL; bp = bp->next) + { + if (bp->raw->inserted) + validate_inserted_breakpoint (bp->raw); + } + + delete_disabled_breakpoints (); +} + void check_mem_read (CORE_ADDR mem_addr, unsigned char *buf, int mem_len) { struct process_info *proc = current_process (); struct raw_breakpoint *bp = proc->raw_breakpoints; CORE_ADDR mem_end = mem_addr + mem_len; + int disabled_one = 0; for (; bp != NULL; bp = bp->next) { @@ -568,8 +648,16 @@ check_mem_read (CORE_ADDR mem_addr, unsigned char *buf, int mem_len) buf_offset = start - mem_addr; if (bp->inserted) - memcpy (buf + buf_offset, bp->old_data + copy_offset, copy_len); + { + if (validate_inserted_breakpoint (bp)) + memcpy (buf + buf_offset, bp->old_data + copy_offset, copy_len); + else + disabled_one = 1; + } } + + if (disabled_one) + delete_disabled_breakpoints (); } void @@ -578,6 +666,7 @@ check_mem_write (CORE_ADDR mem_addr, unsigned char *buf, int mem_len) struct process_info *proc = current_process (); struct raw_breakpoint *bp = proc->raw_breakpoints; CORE_ADDR mem_end = mem_addr + mem_len; + int disabled_one = 0; for (; bp != NULL; bp = bp->next) { @@ -604,8 +693,16 @@ check_mem_write (CORE_ADDR mem_addr, unsigned char *buf, int mem_len) memcpy (bp->old_data + copy_offset, buf + buf_offset, copy_len); if (bp->inserted) - memcpy (buf + buf_offset, breakpoint_data + copy_offset, copy_len); + { + if (validate_inserted_breakpoint (bp)) + memcpy (buf + buf_offset, breakpoint_data + copy_offset, copy_len); + else + disabled_one = 1; + } } + + if (disabled_one) + delete_disabled_breakpoints (); } /* Delete all breakpoints, and un-insert them from the inferior. */ diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.h b/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.h index 01087fd..a226cc7 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.h +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.h @@ -104,4 +104,8 @@ void delete_all_breakpoints (void); void free_all_breakpoints (struct process_info *proc); +/* Check if breakpoints still seem to be inserted in the inferior. */ + +void validate_breakpoints (void); + #endif /* MEM_BREAK_H */ diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c index 232085a..c6fc005 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c @@ -858,6 +858,18 @@ handle_query (char *own_buf, int packet_len, int *new_packet_len_p) if (strcmp ("qSymbol::", own_buf) == 0) { + /* GDB is suggesting new symbols have been loaded. This may + mean a new shared library has been detected as loaded, so + take the opportunity to check if breakpoints we think are + inserted, still are. Note that it isn't guaranteed that + we'll see this when a shared library is loaded, and nor will + we see this for unloads (although breakpoints in unloaded + libraries shouldn't trigger), as GDB may not find symbols for + the library at all. We also re-validate breakpoints when we + see a second GDB breakpoint for the same address, and or when + we access breakpoint shadows. */ + validate_breakpoints (); + if (target_running () && the_target->look_up_symbols != NULL) (*the_target->look_up_symbols) (); -- 2.7.4