From d354a6f150d873440975263530a2e42121d50a51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:23:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ref to workqueue content

Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
---
 .../RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html     | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
index e5d0bbd..7394f03 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ grace period also drove it to completion.
 This straightforward approach had the disadvantage of needing to
 account for POSIX signals sent to user tasks,
 so more recent implemementations use the Linux kernel's
-<a href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/workqueue.txt">workqueues</a>.
+<a href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst">workqueues</a>.
 
 <p>
 The requesting task still does counter snapshotting and funnel-lock
-- 
2.7.4