From d298761746d59ca169dfe68b4d0a983c3053573b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Leoshkevich Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:21:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME for aarch64 attach_probe selftest fails on aarch64 with `failed to create kprobe 'sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory`. This is because, like on several other architectures, nanosleep has a prefix. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Tested-by: Alan Maguire Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220404142101.27900-1-iii@linux.ibm.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h index 93c1ff7..eec4c73 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz); #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep" #elif defined(__s390x__) #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep" +#elif defined(__aarch64__) +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__arm64_sys_nanosleep" #else #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep" #endif -- 2.7.4