From d274e45ce1ed0bc5750f4d3f066bfc164843216b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Parav Pandit Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:50:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/cma: Consider netdevice for RoCE ports When netdevice is not found for a request, and if it for RoCE port, currently it allows matching the listener as long as port number matches by ignoring the netdevice. Now that we always prefer to have netdevice associated with RoCE, when netdevice is not found, don't consider RoCE ports. In other words, a NULL netdevice with RoCE is not acceptable. Therefore, remove this confusing RoCE port ignorance check. Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe --- drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c index 693e025..2eb4022 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c @@ -1470,10 +1470,9 @@ static bool cma_match_net_dev(const struct rdma_cm_id *id, const struct rdma_addr *addr = &id->route.addr; if (!net_dev) - /* This request is an AF_IB request or a RoCE request */ + /* This request is an AF_IB request */ return (!id->port_num || id->port_num == port_num) && - (addr->src_addr.ss_family == AF_IB || - rdma_protocol_roce(id->device, port_num)); + (addr->src_addr.ss_family == AF_IB); return !addr->dev_addr.bound_dev_if || (net_eq(dev_net(net_dev), addr->dev_addr.net) && -- 2.7.4