From d25628bdd66aedd6e07729d8dc6c8ee846d66d72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Bo Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:35:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: protect devices list with its mutex Since we've kill the bigger one volume_mutex, we need to add devices list mutex back. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index db79fb7..92e586b 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -1681,16 +1681,17 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path) filemap_write_and_wait(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping); devices = &root->fs_info->fs_devices->devices; - /* - * we have the volume lock, so we don't need the extra - * device list mutex while reading the list here. - */ + + mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry(device, devices, dev_list) { if (device->bdev == bdev) { ret = -EEXIST; + mutex_unlock( + &root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); goto error; } } + mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); device = kzalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_NOFS); if (!device) { -- 2.7.4