From ce7ec768d61672bcc45c10dd5bc2123ba1e7091f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:01:47 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: dma_buf_vunmap is presumed not to fail, don't let it Since dma_buf_vunmap() procedes blithely on ignorant of whether the driver failed to actually unmap the backing storage for the dma-buf, we need to make a best-effort to do so. This involves not allowing ourselves to be susceptible to signals causing us to leak the storage. This should have been detectable with the current i-g-t as a misplaced signal should have left the pages pinned upon freeing the object where we have a warning in place. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c index 9bb533e..321102a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c @@ -161,12 +161,8 @@ static void i915_gem_dmabuf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, void *vaddr) { struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(dma_buf); struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev; - int ret; - - ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev); - if (ret) - return; + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); if (--obj->vmapping_count == 0) { vunmap(obj->dma_buf_vmapping); obj->dma_buf_vmapping = NULL; -- 2.7.4