From cb12d176326722e2f4ede4e459e86ea36607c555 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ido Schimmel Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:27:31 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mlxsw: tc_restrictions: Test tc-police restrictions Test that upper and lower limits on rate and burst size imposed by the device are rejected by the kernel. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel Reviewed-by: Petr Machata Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh index 9241250..553cb9f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ ALL_TESTS=" matchall_mirror_behind_flower_ingress_test matchall_sample_behind_flower_ingress_test matchall_mirror_behind_flower_egress_test + police_limits_test + multi_police_test " NUM_NETIFS=2 @@ -287,6 +289,80 @@ matchall_mirror_behind_flower_egress_test() matchall_behind_flower_egress_test "mirror" "mirred egress mirror dev $swp2" } +police_limits_test() +{ + RET=0 + + tc qdisc add dev $swp1 clsact + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 0.5kbit burst 1m conform-exceed drop/ok + check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add police action with too low rate" + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 2.5tbit burst 1g conform-exceed drop/ok + check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add police action with too high rate" + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 1.5kbit burst 1m conform-exceed drop/ok + check_err $? "Failed to add police action with low rate" + + tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 1.9tbit burst 1g conform-exceed drop/ok + check_err $? "Failed to add police action with high rate" + + tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 1.5kbit burst 512b conform-exceed drop/ok + check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add police action with too low burst size" + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 1.5kbit burst 2k conform-exceed drop/ok + check_err $? "Failed to add police action with low burst size" + + tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + tc qdisc del dev $swp1 clsact + + log_test "police rate and burst limits" +} + +multi_police_test() +{ + RET=0 + + # It is forbidden in mlxsw driver to have multiple police + # actions in a single rule. + + tc qdisc add dev $swp1 clsact + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 100mbit burst 100k conform-exceed drop/ok + check_err $? "Failed to add rule with single police action" + + tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower + + tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \ + flower skip_sw \ + action police rate 100mbit burst 100k conform-exceed drop/pipe \ + action police rate 200mbit burst 200k conform-exceed drop/ok + check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add rule with two police actions" + + tc qdisc del dev $swp1 clsact + + log_test "multi police" +} + setup_prepare() { swp1=${NETIFS[p1]} -- 2.7.4