From c87609f31a8641009641fc1d19dac75e6de06fd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Moore Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:23:20 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Emit warning if two FACS or DSDT tables found in the FADT Checks if there are two valid but different addresses for the FACS and DSDT within the FADT (mismatch between the 32-bit and 64-bit fields.) Signed-off-by: Bob Moore Signed-off-by: Lin Ming Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c b/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c index d2e60a8..14661a8 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c @@ -286,14 +286,27 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void) acpi_gbl_FADT.header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_fadt); - /* Expand the 32-bit FACS and DSDT addresses to 64-bit as necessary */ - + /* + * Expand the 32-bit FACS and DSDT addresses to 64-bit as necessary. + * Later code will always use the X 64-bit field. Also, check for an + * address mismatch between the 32-bit and 64-bit address fields + * (FIRMWARE_CTRL/X_FIRMWARE_CTRL, DSDT/X_DSDT) which would indicate + * the presence of two FACS or two DSDT tables. + */ if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs) { acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs = (u64) acpi_gbl_FADT.facs; + } else if (acpi_gbl_FADT.facs && + (acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs != (u64) acpi_gbl_FADT.facs)) { + ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO, + "32/64 FACS address mismatch in FADT - two FACS tables!")); } if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.Xdsdt) { acpi_gbl_FADT.Xdsdt = (u64) acpi_gbl_FADT.dsdt; + } else if (acpi_gbl_FADT.dsdt && + (acpi_gbl_FADT.Xdsdt != (u64) acpi_gbl_FADT.dsdt)) { + ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO, + "32/64 DSDT address mismatch in FADT - two DSDT tables!")); } /* -- 2.7.4