From c749b3e96398fcc39286267b72fb8b85c0f757ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Shishkin Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:05:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Kill off intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl for good The x86_lbr_exclusive commit (4807034248be "perf/x86: Mark Intel PT and LBR/BTS as mutually exclusive") mistakenly moved intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl() to perf_event.h, while another commit (a46a2300019 "perf: Simplify the branch stack check") removed it in favor of needs_branch_stack(). This patch gets rid of intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl() for good. Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: acme@infradead.org Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435140349-32588-3-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h index 3e7fd27..3474cf2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h @@ -808,20 +808,6 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL -static inline bool intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(struct perf_event *event) -{ - /* user explicitly requested branch sampling */ - if (has_branch_stack(event)) - return true; - - /* implicit branch sampling to correct PEBS skid */ - if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && - x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) - return true; - - return false; -} - static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event) { if (event->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS && -- 2.7.4