From c68ae339e71031d92300df56346eb8edd26a09b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paulo Zanoni Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:10:51 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't disable_fbc() if FBC is already disabled If FBC is disabled we will still call intel_fbc_invalidate(), and as a result we may call intel_fbc_deactivate(), which will try to touch registers. I'm pretty sure I saw this happen on a runtime suspended device, and I'm almost sure I was running igt/pm_rpm. It produced the "you touched registers while the device is suspended" WARNs. But this was some time ago and I can't remember exactly which conditions were necessary to reproduce the problem. v2: Rebase to new series order. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-8-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c index 102dfa0..7f8832f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c @@ -438,7 +438,8 @@ static void __intel_fbc_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) intel_fbc_cancel_work(dev_priv); - dev_priv->fbc.disable_fbc(dev_priv); + if (dev_priv->fbc.enabled) + dev_priv->fbc.disable_fbc(dev_priv); dev_priv->fbc.crtc = NULL; } -- 2.7.4