From c624d33f61cd05241e85b906311f0b712fdb0f32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:09:27 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] stack_trace: Add weak save_stack_trace_regs() Add weak symbol of save_stack_trace_regs() as same as save_stack_trace_tsk() since that is not implemented except x86 yet. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Namhyung Kim Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110608070927.17777.37895.stgit@fedora15 Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/stacktrace.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/stacktrace.c b/kernel/stacktrace.c index eb212f8..d20c698 100644 --- a/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -26,12 +26,18 @@ void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_stack_trace); /* - * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk get this - * weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning (whenever this facility - * is utilized - for example by procfs): + * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk or + * save_stack_trace_regs get this weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning + * (whenever this facility is utilized - for example by procfs): */ __weak void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace) { WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_tsk() not implemented yet.\n"); } + +__weak void +save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace) +{ + WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet.\n"); +} -- 2.7.4