From c5514758ddd9a774d879b098bf7364c45a76bed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrey Ryabinin Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 13:08:46 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] vhost_test: remove vhost_test_flush_vq() vhost_test_flush_vq() just a simple wrapper around vhost_work_dev_flush() which seems have no value. It's just easier to call vhost_work_dev_flush() directly. Besides there is no point in obtaining vhost_dev pointer via 'n->vqs[index].poll.dev' while we can just use &n->dev. It's the same pointers, see vhost_test_open()/vhost_dev_init(). Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin Signed-off-by: Mike Christie Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Acked-by: Jason Wang Message-Id: <20220517180850.198915-5-michael.christie@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella --- drivers/vhost/test.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/test.c b/drivers/vhost/test.c index f0ac9e35f5d6..de39151366c5 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/test.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/test.c @@ -144,14 +144,9 @@ static void vhost_test_stop(struct vhost_test *n, void **privatep) *privatep = vhost_test_stop_vq(n, n->vqs + VHOST_TEST_VQ); } -static void vhost_test_flush_vq(struct vhost_test *n, int index) -{ - vhost_work_dev_flush(n->vqs[index].poll.dev); -} - static void vhost_test_flush(struct vhost_test *n) { - vhost_test_flush_vq(n, VHOST_TEST_VQ); + vhost_work_dev_flush(&n->dev); } static int vhost_test_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f) @@ -210,7 +205,7 @@ static long vhost_test_run(struct vhost_test *n, int test) goto err; if (oldpriv) { - vhost_test_flush_vq(n, index); + vhost_test_flush(n); } } @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static long vhost_test_set_backend(struct vhost_test *n, unsigned index, int fd) mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); if (enable) { - vhost_test_flush_vq(n, index); + vhost_test_flush(n); } mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex); -- 2.34.1