From c03ae4876fd54822a22375aa4fc49736a8c3a5d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Minghao Chi Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:09:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code Reported-by: Zeal Robot Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408080931.2494356-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c index 081da1f..b5b65d8 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c @@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static int ti_qspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) dev_dbg(qspi->dev, "hz: %d, clock divider %d\n", qspi->spi_max_frequency, clk_div); - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(qspi->dev); if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(qspi->dev); dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n"); return ret; } -- 2.7.4