From bfe2e8f569073e7297ad19932b980964105bb777 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stas Sergeev Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 21:52:24 +0500 Subject: [PATCH] selftests: add OFD lock tests Test the basic locking stuff on 2 fds: multiple read locks, conflicts between read and write locks, use of len==0 for queries. Also tests for F_UNLCK F_OFD_GETLK extension. [ jlayton: fix unlink() pathname in selftest ] Cc: Jeff Layton Cc: Chuck Lever Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile | 5 ++ tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..478e82f --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +TEST_GEN_PROGS := ofdlocks + +include ../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a55b798 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "../kselftest.h" + +static int lock_set(int fd, struct flock *fl) +{ + int ret; + + fl->l_pid = 0; // needed for OFD locks + fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET; + ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, fl); + if (ret) + perror("fcntl()"); + return ret; +} + +static int lock_get(int fd, struct flock *fl) +{ + int ret; + + fl->l_pid = 0; // needed for OFD locks + fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET; + ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, fl); + if (ret) + perror("fcntl()"); + return ret; +} + +int main(void) +{ + int rc; + struct flock fl, fl2; + int fd = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0600); + int fd2 = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDONLY); + + unlink("/tmp/aa"); + assert(fd != -1); + assert(fd2 != -1); + ksft_print_msg("[INFO] opened fds %i %i\n", fd, fd2); + + /* Set some read lock */ + fl.l_type = F_RDLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 3; + rc = lock_set(fd, &fl); + if (rc == 0) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] set OFD read lock on first fd\n"); + } else { + ksft_print_msg("[FAIL] to set OFD read lock on first fd\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Make sure read locks do not conflict on different fds. */ + fl.l_type = F_RDLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + return -1; + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg("[FAIL] read locks conflicted\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Make sure read/write locks do conflict on different fds. */ + fl.l_type = F_WRLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + return -1; + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] read and write locks conflicted\n"); + } else { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] read and write locks not conflicted\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Get info about the lock on first fd. */ + fl.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd, &fl); + if (rc != 0) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n"); + return -1; + } + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n", + fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len); + } else { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK did not return lock info\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Try the same but by locking everything by len==0. */ + fl2.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl2.l_start = 0; + fl2.l_len = 0; + rc = lock_get(fd, &fl2); + if (rc != 0) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n"); + return -1; + } + if (memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl))) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n", + fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len); + return -1; + } + ksft_print_msg("[SUCCESS] F_UNLCK with len==0 returned the same\n"); + /* Get info about the lock on second fd - no locks on it. */ + fl.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl.l_start = 0; + fl.l_len = 0; + lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK return lock info from another fd\n"); + return -1; + } + return 0; +} -- 2.7.4