From bf988435bd5b53529f4408a8efb1f433f6ddfda9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Hutchings Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:45:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ethtool: Fix potential user buffer overflow for ETHTOOL_{G, S}RXFH struct ethtool_rxnfc was originally defined in 2.6.27 for the ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH command with only the cmd, flow_type and data fields. It was then extended in 2.6.30 to support various additional commands. These commands should have been defined to use a new structure, but it is too late to change that now. Since user-space may still be using the old structure definition for the ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH commands, and since they do not need the additional fields, only copy the originally defined fields to and from user-space. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/linux/ethtool.h | 2 ++ net/core/ethtool.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h index 276b40a..b4207ca 100644 --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@ struct ethtool_rxnfc { __u32 flow_type; /* The rx flow hash value or the rule DB size */ __u64 data; + /* The following fields are not valid and must not be used for + * the ETHTOOL_{G,X}RXFH commands. */ struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec fs; __u32 rule_cnt; __u32 rule_locs[0]; diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c index a3a7e9a..75e4ffe 100644 --- a/net/core/ethtool.c +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c @@ -318,23 +318,33 @@ out: } static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, - void __user *useraddr) + u32 cmd, void __user *useraddr) { - struct ethtool_rxnfc cmd; + struct ethtool_rxnfc info; + size_t info_size = sizeof(info); if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxnfc) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (copy_from_user(&cmd, useraddr, sizeof(cmd))) + /* struct ethtool_rxnfc was originally defined for + * ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH with only the cmd, flow_type and data + * members. User-space might still be using that + * definition. */ + if (cmd == ETHTOOL_SRXFH) + info_size = (offsetof(struct ethtool_rxnfc, data) + + sizeof(info.data)); + + if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, info_size)) return -EFAULT; - return dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxnfc(dev, &cmd); + return dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxnfc(dev, &info); } static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, - void __user *useraddr) + u32 cmd, void __user *useraddr) { struct ethtool_rxnfc info; + size_t info_size = sizeof(info); const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops; int ret; void *rule_buf = NULL; @@ -342,7 +352,15 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, if (!ops->get_rxnfc) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, sizeof(info))) + /* struct ethtool_rxnfc was originally defined for + * ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH with only the cmd, flow_type and data + * members. User-space might still be using that + * definition. */ + if (cmd == ETHTOOL_GRXFH) + info_size = (offsetof(struct ethtool_rxnfc, data) + + sizeof(info.data)); + + if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, info_size)) return -EFAULT; if (info.cmd == ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL) { @@ -360,7 +378,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, goto err_out; ret = -EFAULT; - if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &info, sizeof(info))) + if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &info, info_size)) goto err_out; if (rule_buf) { @@ -1517,12 +1535,12 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr) case ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLCNT: case ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRULE: case ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL: - rc = ethtool_get_rxnfc(dev, useraddr); + rc = ethtool_get_rxnfc(dev, ethcmd, useraddr); break; case ETHTOOL_SRXFH: case ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLDEL: case ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLINS: - rc = ethtool_set_rxnfc(dev, useraddr); + rc = ethtool_set_rxnfc(dev, ethcmd, useraddr); break; case ETHTOOL_GGRO: rc = ethtool_get_gro(dev, useraddr); -- 2.7.4