From bc96ff59b2f19e924d9e15e24cee19723d674b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johan Hedberg Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:58:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix SSP acceptor just-works confirmation without MITM commit ba15a58b179ed76a7e887177f2b06de12c58ec8f upstream. From the Bluetooth Core Specification 4.1 page 1958: "if both devices have set the Authentication_Requirements parameter to one of the MITM Protection Not Required options, authentication stage 1 shall function as if both devices set their IO capabilities to DisplayOnly (e.g., Numeric comparison with automatic confirmation on both devices)" So far our implementation has done user confirmation for all just-works cases regardless of the MITM requirements, however following the specification to the word means that we should not be doing confirmation when neither side has the MITM flag set. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg Tested-by: Szymon Janc Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c index 21b2de1..04bff67 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c @@ -3156,8 +3156,11 @@ static inline void hci_user_confirm_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, /* If we're not the initiators request authorization to * proceed from user space (mgmt_user_confirm with - * confirm_hint set to 1). */ - if (!test_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH_PEND, &conn->flags)) { + * confirm_hint set to 1). The exception is if neither + * side had MITM in which case we do auto-accept. + */ + if (!test_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH_PEND, &conn->flags) && + (loc_mitm || rem_mitm)) { BT_DBG("Confirming auto-accept as acceptor"); confirm_hint = 1; goto confirm; -- 2.7.4