From b666a9cd993c6a49c4bf23a1ed476359c978f60b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:24:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: add barrier for waitqueue_active in clear_btree_io_tree waitqueue_active should be preceded by a barrier, in this function we don't need to call it all the time. Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index 74bc333..e8e5b5a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ void btrfs_put_transaction(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction) static void clear_btree_io_tree(struct extent_io_tree *tree) { spin_lock(&tree->lock); + /* + * Do a single barrier for the waitqueue_active check here, the state + * of the waitqueue should not change once clear_btree_io_tree is + * called. + */ + smp_mb(); while (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&tree->state)) { struct rb_node *node; struct extent_state *state; -- 2.7.4