From b37ab91907e9002925f4217e3bbd496aa12c2fa3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yinghai Lu Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:36:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86: Sanity check the e820 against the SRAT table using e820 map only node_cover_memory() sanity checks the SRAT table by ensuring that all PXMs cover the memory reported in the e820. However, when calculating the size of the holes in the e820, it uses the early_node_map[] which contains information taken from both SRAT and e820. If the SRAT is missing an entry, then it is not detected that the SRAT table is incorrect and missing entries. This patch uses the e820 map to calculate the holes instead of early_node_map[]. comment is from Mel. [ Impact: reject incorrect SRAT tables ] Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Acked-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton LKML-Reference: <4A03E10C.60906@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c index 0176595..c7a18aa 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes) pxmram = 0; } - e820ram = max_pfn - absent_pages_in_range(0, max_pfn); + e820ram = max_pfn - (e820_hole_size(0, max_pfn<>PAGE_SHIFT); /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow a bit of slack. */ if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= 1*1024*1024) { printk(KERN_ERR -- 2.7.4