From b24b6478e65f140610ab1ffaadc7bc6bf0be8aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:29:43 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reorder cpufreq_online() error code path Ideally the de-allocation of resources should happen in the exact opposite order in which they were allocated. It helps maintain the code in long term, even if nothing really breaks with incorrect ordering. That wasn't followed in cpufreq_online() and it has some inconsistencies. For example, the symlinks were created from within the locked region while they are removed only after putting the locks. Also ->exit() should have been called only after the symlinks are removed and the lock is dropped, as that was the case when ->init() was first called. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index de33ebf..8814c57 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1327,14 +1327,14 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) return 0; out_exit_policy: + for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus) + remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, get_cpu_device(j)); + up_write(&policy->rwsem); if (cpufreq_driver->exit) cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); - for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus) - remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, get_cpu_device(j)); - out_free_policy: cpufreq_policy_free(policy); return ret; -- 2.7.4