From b248bf303461fa2cd83f6e77bb1e045b85f65de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wschmidt Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:58:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 2011-07-29 Bill Schmidt PR tree-optimization/49749 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (get_rank): New forward declaration. (PHI_LOOP_BIAS): New macro. (phi_rank): New function. (loop_carried_phi): Likewise. (propagate_rank): Likewise. (get_rank): Add calls to phi_rank and propagate_rank. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@176984 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 10 ++++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index c631dfc..7576188 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +2011-07-31 Bill Schmidt + + PR tree-optimization/49749 + * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (get_rank): New forward declaration. + (PHI_LOOP_BIAS): New macro. + (phi_rank): New function. + (loop_carried_phi): Likewise. + (propagate_rank): Likewise. + (get_rank): Add calls to phi_rank and propagate_rank. + 2011-07-31 H.J. Lu * config/i386/x86-64.h (SIZE_TYPE): Check TARGET_LP64 instead diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c index 86d26fb..51f7ef8 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c @@ -190,6 +190,114 @@ static long *bb_rank; /* Operand->rank hashtable. */ static struct pointer_map_t *operand_rank; +/* Forward decls. */ +static long get_rank (tree); + + +/* Bias amount for loop-carried phis. We want this to be larger than + the depth of any reassociation tree we can see, but not larger than + the rank difference between two blocks. */ +#define PHI_LOOP_BIAS (1 << 15) + +/* Rank assigned to a phi statement. If STMT is a loop-carried phi of + an innermost loop, and the phi has only a single use which is inside + the loop, then the rank is the block rank of the loop latch plus an + extra bias for the loop-carried dependence. This causes expressions + calculated into an accumulator variable to be independent for each + iteration of the loop. If STMT is some other phi, the rank is the + block rank of its containing block. */ +static long +phi_rank (gimple stmt) +{ + basic_block bb = gimple_bb (stmt); + struct loop *father = bb->loop_father; + tree res; + unsigned i; + use_operand_p use; + gimple use_stmt; + + /* We only care about real loops (those with a latch). */ + if (!father->latch) + return bb_rank[bb->index]; + + /* Interesting phis must be in headers of innermost loops. */ + if (bb != father->header + || father->inner) + return bb_rank[bb->index]; + + /* Ignore virtual SSA_NAMEs. */ + res = gimple_phi_result (stmt); + if (!is_gimple_reg (SSA_NAME_VAR (res))) + return bb_rank[bb->index]; + + /* The phi definition must have a single use, and that use must be + within the loop. Otherwise this isn't an accumulator pattern. */ + if (!single_imm_use (res, &use, &use_stmt) + || gimple_bb (use_stmt)->loop_father != father) + return bb_rank[bb->index]; + + /* Look for phi arguments from within the loop. If found, bias this phi. */ + for (i = 0; i < gimple_phi_num_args (stmt); i++) + { + tree arg = gimple_phi_arg_def (stmt, i); + if (TREE_CODE (arg) == SSA_NAME + && !SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (arg)) + { + gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (arg); + if (gimple_bb (def_stmt)->loop_father == father) + return bb_rank[father->latch->index] + PHI_LOOP_BIAS; + } + } + + /* Must be an uninteresting phi. */ + return bb_rank[bb->index]; +} + +/* If EXP is an SSA_NAME defined by a PHI statement that represents a + loop-carried dependence of an innermost loop, return TRUE; else + return FALSE. */ +static bool +loop_carried_phi (tree exp) +{ + gimple phi_stmt; + long block_rank; + + if (TREE_CODE (exp) != SSA_NAME + || SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (exp)) + return false; + + phi_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (exp); + + if (gimple_code (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (exp)) != GIMPLE_PHI) + return false; + + /* Non-loop-carried phis have block rank. Loop-carried phis have + an additional bias added in. If this phi doesn't have block rank, + it's biased and should not be propagated. */ + block_rank = bb_rank[gimple_bb (phi_stmt)->index]; + + if (phi_rank (phi_stmt) != block_rank) + return true; + + return false; +} + +/* Return the maximum of RANK and the rank that should be propagated + from expression OP. For most operands, this is just the rank of OP. + For loop-carried phis, the value is zero to avoid undoing the bias + in favor of the phi. */ +static long +propagate_rank (long rank, tree op) +{ + long op_rank; + + if (loop_carried_phi (op)) + return rank; + + op_rank = get_rank (op); + + return MAX (rank, op_rank); +} /* Look up the operand rank structure for expression E. */ @@ -232,11 +340,38 @@ get_rank (tree e) I make no claims that this is optimal, however, it gives good results. */ + /* We make an exception to the normal ranking system to break + dependences of accumulator variables in loops. Suppose we + have a simple one-block loop containing: + + x_1 = phi(x_0, x_2) + b = a + x_1 + c = b + d + x_2 = c + e + + As shown, each iteration of the calculation into x is fully + dependent upon the iteration before it. We would prefer to + see this in the form: + + x_1 = phi(x_0, x_2) + b = a + d + c = b + e + x_2 = c + x_1 + + If the loop is unrolled, the calculations of b and c from + different iterations can be interleaved. + + To obtain this result during reassociation, we bias the rank + of the phi definition x_1 upward, when it is recognized as an + accumulator pattern. The artificial rank causes it to be + added last, providing the desired independence. */ + if (TREE_CODE (e) == SSA_NAME) { gimple stmt; long rank; int i, n; + tree op; if (TREE_CODE (SSA_NAME_VAR (e)) == PARM_DECL && SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (e)) @@ -246,6 +381,9 @@ get_rank (tree e) if (gimple_bb (stmt) == NULL) return 0; + if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI) + return phi_rank (stmt); + if (!is_gimple_assign (stmt) || gimple_vdef (stmt)) return bb_rank[gimple_bb (stmt)->index]; @@ -255,20 +393,25 @@ get_rank (tree e) if (rank != -1) return rank; - /* Otherwise, find the maximum rank for the operands, or the bb - rank, whichever is less. */ + /* Otherwise, find the maximum rank for the operands. As an + exception, remove the bias from loop-carried phis when propagating + the rank so that dependent operations are not also biased. */ rank = 0; if (gimple_assign_single_p (stmt)) { tree rhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt); n = TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH (rhs); if (n == 0) - rank = MAX (rank, get_rank (rhs)); + rank = propagate_rank (rank, rhs); else { for (i = 0; i < n; i++) - if (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, i)) - rank = MAX(rank, get_rank (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, i))); + { + op = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, i); + + if (op != NULL_TREE) + rank = propagate_rank (rank, op); + } } } else @@ -276,8 +419,9 @@ get_rank (tree e) n = gimple_num_ops (stmt); for (i = 1; i < n; i++) { - gcc_assert (gimple_op (stmt, i)); - rank = MAX(rank, get_rank (gimple_op (stmt, i))); + op = gimple_op (stmt, i); + gcc_assert (op); + rank = propagate_rank (rank, op); } } -- 2.7.4