From b0bf6df7dc9aca27060dd29d1bc1b84c28baf529 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Clark Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:39:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] I can't spell (well know fact) and while I'm there correct other spelling, grammar and capitalisation imperfections. p4raw-id: //depot/perl@32017 --- lib/overload.t | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/overload.t b/lib/overload.t index 2af4c37..34b4521 100644 --- a/lib/overload.t +++ b/lib/overload.t @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ use overload ( qw( "" stringify -0+ numify) # Order of arguments unsignificant +0+ numify) # Order of arguments insignificant ); sub new { @@ -744,10 +744,10 @@ else { }, 'deref'; # Hash: my @cont = sort %$deref; - if ("\t" eq "\011") { # ascii + if ("\t" eq "\011") { # ASCII is("@cont", '23 5 fake foo'); } - else { # ebcdic alpha-numeric sort order + else { # EBCDIC alpha-numeric sort order is("@cont", 'fake foo 23 5'); } my @keys = sort keys %$deref; @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ unless ($aaa) { main::is("$int_x", 1054); } -# make sure that we don't inifinitely recurse +# make sure that we don't infinitely recurse { my $c = 0; package Recurse; @@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ like ($@, qr/zap/); like(overload::StrVal($no), qr/^no_overload=ARRAY\(0x[0-9a-f]+\)$/); } -# These are all check that overloaded values rather than reference addressess +# These are all check that overloaded values rather than reference addresses # are what is getting tested. my ($two, $one, $un, $deux) = map {new Numify $_} 2, 1, 1, 2; my ($ein, $zwei) = (1, 2); @@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ foreach my $op (qw(<=> == != < <= > >=)) { my $obj; $obj = bless {name => 'cool'}, 'Sklorsh'; $obj->delete; - ok(eval {if ($obj) {1}; 1}, $@ || 'reblessed into nonexist namespace'); + ok(eval {if ($obj) {1}; 1}, $@ || 'reblessed into nonexistent namespace'); $obj = bless {name => 'cool'}, 'Sklorsh'; $obj->delete_with_self; @@ -1336,9 +1336,9 @@ foreach my $op (qw(<=> == != < <= > >=)) { { # Subtle bug pre 5.10, as a side effect of the overloading flag being - # stored on the reference rather than the referant. Despite the fact that + # stored on the reference rather than the referent. Despite the fact that # objects can only be accessed via references (even internally), the - # referant actually knows that it's blessed, not the references. So taking + # referent actually knows that it's blessed, not the references. So taking # a new, unrelated, reference to it gives an object. However, the # overloading-or-not flag was on the reference prior to 5.10, and taking # a new reference didn't (use to) copy it. -- 2.7.4