From b03671a826ba9873724164c6c96e82d0f9f5988d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Harvey Harrison Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:32:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: ac97_patch make functions static Only used in ac97_codec by including ac97_patch.c directly, effectively static Found by sparse: sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c:3551:5: warning: symbol 'patch_vt1617a' was not declared. Should it be static? sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c:3767:5: warning: symbol 'patch_vt1618' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela --- sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c b/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c index d0cab1d..6ce3cbe 100644 --- a/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c +++ b/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c @@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_ac97_controls_vt1617a[] = { }, }; -int patch_vt1617a(struct snd_ac97 * ac97) +static int patch_vt1617a(struct snd_ac97 * ac97) { int err = 0; int val; @@ -3764,7 +3764,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_ac97_controls_vt1618[] = { } }; -int patch_vt1618(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) +static int patch_vt1618(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) { return patch_build_controls(ac97, snd_ac97_controls_vt1618, ARRAY_SIZE(snd_ac97_controls_vt1618)); -- 2.7.4